Comments on: Comparing .NET DI (IoC) Frameworks, Part 2

By: IOC Starter « Sachin Chavan

IOC Starter « Sachin Chavan — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:08:27 +0000

[...] .NET DI (IoC) Frameworks Part 1 and Part 2 [...]

By: Tagesgeldvergleich

Tagesgeldvergleich — Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:56:24 +0000

I never liked these methods..

By: Angelreisen

Angelreisen — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 14:45:25 +0000

Awesome, thank you for sharing.

By: Angelreisen

Angelreisen — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 05:45:25 +0000

Awesome, thank you for sharing.

By: Alleinunterhalter Köln

Alleinunterhalter Köln — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:06:58 +0000

I think frameworks a little bit complicated, but it does an awesome job for sure.
Thanks for sharing.

By: Selecting IoC framework - Vagif Abilov's blog on .NET

Selecting IoC framework - Vagif Abilov's blog on .NET — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:52:21 +0000

[...] .NET DI (IoC) Frameworks (part1 and part2) by Andrey Shchekin. Very good comparison with source code uploaded to Google [...]

By: .NET DI (IoC) Frameworks, Revisited » Blog Archive » I Think It’s Interesting

Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:29:08 +0000

[...] Comparing .NET DI (IoC) Frameworks, Part 2 [...]

By: Andrey Shchekin

Andrey Shchekin — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 08:58:41 +0000

I see what you are trying to achieve more as MEF/System.AddIn functionality than as basic IoC.

I will look at it when time allows, in the meanwhile you can use test suite at
http://code.google.com/p/net-ioc-frameworks/
to see how it corresponds to common IoC features.

By: hack2root

hack2root — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:57:28 +0000

Please, cay you see my framework http://plugins.codeplex.com. I'm luck of time so it hadn't been documented yet, but i'm very interested in comparison to other frameworks.

By: Veyton

Veyton — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 01:02:48 +0000

awesome articel, thanks for sharing but sometimes frameworks are a bit difficult.